Erica Baum at Bureau |
Erica Baum’s
second solo show at Bureau invited the viewer to explore a thoughtfully-curated
and somewhat mysterious pictorial narrative.
In “Naked Eye,” Baum displayed a series of photographs of the pictures
that illustrate several weathered paperback books. Each snapshot creates a somewhat alarming
disconnect between that which is contained in the pages of the book and the
book itself. The photographs are closely-framed
images of the fanned-out pages of each book, flattening the three-dimensional
object and leaving the observer to sort out exactly what is being viewed. These compositions resemble carefully
constructed collages of black and white portraits placed among strips of
brightly colored vertical page edges.
Baum recontextualizes printed pictures, taking these common paperback
books and adopting new perspectives as a way to encourage the viewer to derive
his or her own narrative from the collection of unsettling images.
Erica Baum, Shift, 2012 |
The display
of the photographs at Bureau is straightforward and not overly crowded. Had the gallery decided to display more
images, the dramatic aspects of the desire present in the images may have
gotten lost in an excessively complicated narrative. Giving the viewer an ample opportunity to
interact with a photograph like Shift
allows the imagined narrative to progress.
Baum’s compositions enhance the voyeuristic theme that winds its way in
and out of each abstracted frame. Because
we are not looking directly into the book that was photographed, and are
ultimately unable to confront the subject directly, the point of view becomes a
somewhat jarring, uncomfortable glimpse into this printed world of “Naked Eye.”
Good work describing this show! I like your analysis of the experience of the viewer with the pieces, particularly the discussion of the meta photograph. There are parts in the first paragraph that might be a little confusing to someone who hasn't seen the show yet, though. You mention the collage-like appearance of the portraits framed by colored verticals- it might be helpful to mention that the verticals are from the edges of pages in the book. You also mention an evolving narrative several times, but the narrative seems to be fairly consistent to me. The individual pieces each fit within a concept, but I don't perceive a strong sense of a progression in an overarching story.
ReplyDeleteGood work describing this show! I like your analysis of the experience of the viewer with the pieces, particularly the discussion of the meta photograph. There are parts in the first paragraph that might be a little confusing to someone who hasn't seen the show yet, though. You mention the collage-like appearance of the portraits framed by colored verticals- it might be helpful to mention that the verticals are from the edges of pages in the book. You also mention an evolving narrative several times, but the narrative seems to be fairly consistent to me. The individual pieces each fit within a concept, but I don't perceive a strong sense of a progression in an overarching story.
ReplyDeleteYou present several compelling interpretations of this work, such as the feeling of looking into a peephole and the overall sense of mystery. I am a bit confused by your argument concerning "narrative." The term is used many times in the review, but I think it could be explained better how the specific images in the show create a unified narrative. Perhaps the relation to the concept of "narrative" is brought up by the encapsulation of these photos in book pages? The review might also benefit from another close examination of one piece. Your discussion of "Shift" is thoughtful, but feels tacked on at the end, and crowds your concluding sentence. The insights are definitely here, but I think the structural organization could be tweaked a bit.
ReplyDelete