The labyrinthine
rooms at MoMA PS1 are lined with an exhibition titled New Pictures of Common Objects,
an aptly named collection of works in media as diverse as photography,
sculpture, video and installations, many of which contain common, everyday
objects for which the show is named. The works attempt to create a dialogue referring
to the state of the world today based on its forms of communication and
technology. Trisha Baga, Lucas Blalock, Josh
Kline, Margaret Lee, and Helen Marten, the five young artists represented
in this contemporary show, convey the effects that both new and old forms of
mass communication have on the state of the world and this young generation
that now lives within its interconnected confines. Margaret Lee and Josh Kline
are two artists represented that specifically capture the consumerism of common
technological devices in powerful and humorous manners.
By focusing on
everyday objects and readymades, one artist in particular conveys the state of
the world’s correspondence. Margaret Lee, a young New York-based artist, creates
appropriated art, producing works that become humorous renditions of common
items. Her collection of pieces in the show, such as Cucumber Phone and Eggplant
Phone, Lee produces humorous telephones shaped as vegetables; one hangs on
a wall, another sits on the entryway table- locations one would expect the
telephone to be. However, she spins the notion of talking on the phone into one
of complete absurdity. Cucumber Phone
has a very realistic pickle as a handle; Eggplant
Phone is entirely shaped like its namesake. Both of these objects are
situated in a room reminiscent of a grandmother’s living room that is complete
with wallpaper and floral arrangements, with few details spared in creating a
specific sentimental ambiance. By
handling her collection of witty, culinary-inspired sculptures of
semi-readymade in this way, Lee highlights outdated forms of communication,
while appropriating the technology of yesteryear and filling a new void,
recycling to create nostalgia.
Contrasted with
Margaret Lee’s telephones are Josh Kline’s pigmented silicone works, Creative Hands. These eerie,
disembodied hands hold various technological devices, such as cameras and
remote controls, which are lined on stark white shelves similar to what one
would see in a supermarket or convenience store. An interesting commentary on
the consumer nature of society fitting for the overall exhibition, this critique
of consumer culture strikes an uncomfortable nerve in the viewer. Rapid
advancements in technology create more desire for objects, and a fear the
removal of these objects from our hands. Even when on display in such a sterile
space, people cannot stop their preoccupation with items. Though Kline’s hands
are unnerving, he also includes the amusing aspect that allows each viewer to
laugh at himself/herself, as he or she uses their own pieces of technology to
document the critique on this very gesture.
Both these young
artists have much to say about mass communication and consumerism. Through the
redundant visualization of technological devices, Margaret Lee and Josh Kline
have created entertaining yet critical atmospheres in which the viewer feels
simultaneously comfortable and on edge. With
the state of high-tech correspondence today, and the ease at which one is able
to connect with another, it is a reminder not only of how far our technology
has come, but also of the current frenzy to stay connected to one another.
I appreciate the tight focus on these two artists and the works you selected. It strengthens your argument to limit it in this way. I think you should make it a bit clearer, however, that these are not the only artists in the show. Maybe mention it explicitly in the conclusion, tying the show overall to your points about Kline and Lee. I also feel that the paragraph on Kline is stronger. I think this may be because you describe the piece before analyzing it, whereas in the preceding paragraph about Margaret Lee, the formal description comes after the conceptual ideas. Simply switching the sentence order would, I think, make the paragraph clearer.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis is a good discussion of the two works you selected. However, I would have liked to see you spend a little more time analyzing their inclusion in the show with respect to some of the other types of work/artists who were exhibited. Maybe to point out that the inclusion of these works with reference to someone who displayed photography or video would bolster your argument that these two artists had the strongest work in the show because they were object-based. Also, try to pay a little more attention to your word choice, getting rid of some of the redundancy will help your argument to flow a little better.
ReplyDelete