Henry
Taylor, a Los Angeles-based African American artist lauded for his colorful
acrylic portraits, has a gift of capturing the nuanced moods of his sitters
despite using a bare, non-naturalistic painting style. March Forth, his
new solo exhibition, is a foray from these figurative paintings into drawing,
sculpture, and installation. Inspired by Taylor’s recent trip to Ethiopia, the
gallery has been transformed into a low-lit abyss complete with a dirt floor, a
taxidermied hyena, and a reconstructed hut of found objects. Taylor’s search
for self-expression with new media regrettably feels like a stereotypical
African rendering.
One of the large-scale works in March Forth
is a black hanging sculpture that spans the gallery’s rear wall. The
twelve-foot long untitled piece consists of plastic bottles, detergent
containers, and gas canisters nailed to a plywood support spray-painted black.
Taylor undoubtedly recognizes their resemblance to traditional African masks,
and he accumulates the containers into a collage of varying shapes so that
faces of numerous dimensions pop out. This concept is hardly new, conjuring the
painted jerrican masks by contemporary African artist Romuald Hazoume. Yet the
two artists differ in their treatment of the containers; Hazoume employs
uniformity in his assemblage while Taylor abolishes it. The latter’s
approach is spontaneous, subtly applying order to a haphazard collection of
bottles that might have once been scattered across his studio floor.
Bidon Armé by Romuald Hazoumé, 2004 |
The centerpiece of the show is Taylor’s
reconstructed Ethiopian hut taking up the central space of the gallery. Made up
of found and collected objects, the hut is a hodgepodge of brooms and other
cleaning tools, a rolled up rug, wooden wheels, ladders, beer bottles and
walking sticks for the blind. The openness of the structure welcomes the viewer
in for a turn around its interior, and inside are piles of dirt that
appear placed equidistantly apart. At its back sits a television playing the
video interview of an Ethiopian boy, a Denny’s box sitting atop as if
signifying a westernized influence. The hut appears to be an attempt at calming
or systematizing a chaotic assortment, but falls short of intelligibly
communicating any greater purpose. The materials do not seem to be placed schematically
aside from the goal of allowing the hut to securely stand. Taylor has been
known to use found objects like cigarette packs and cereal boxes as surfaces
for his paintings, but the theme in this context—dirty and lacking a framework
for deeper contemplation—reads as a clichéd characterization of Africa.
In March Forth, Henry Taylor’s exploration
into sculpture and installation is the focus of the show, but too many
stereotypical elements—the dirt, the hyena, the hut—give the show a banality
and drown out the profundity behind these new creations. For a figurative painter
with such a knack for capturing the idiosyncrasies of his subjects and the
larger cultural implications they represent, these qualities are not portrayed
through this show.
I think that this is a very strong review of very complex work. This show was so full of stuff it was hard to find a moment to think. You do a nice job of recreating this feeling with words.
ReplyDeleteI would suggest not mentioning his previous work twice in the paper. While I think it is strong when you make comparisons between the new work and some well known examples, it is mostly a distraction from what the show provided. Instead, you might want to begin the paper with a description of the show, as you did in P2. You mix in some reference to his older work in the middle of the review and I think that is enough.
All in all, great job.
I agree with Patrick and I think this review is really well written.
ReplyDeleteI think you recreate the atmosphere of the show wery well. You make some strong points and I enjoyed your personal reflections, in particular the way you compare the container collage work with Romuald Hazoume’s original work. Since the entire exhibition shows the new approach of the artist to the African culture, I think it is important to see the correlation with his previous paintings. The last few sentences have a clear message. I didn’t know his paintings but the way you underline his new ‘artistic transformation’ make me reflect on the importance of this curatorial choice.
After seeing this show I honestly didn't know what the take away was. I'm still not sure that I fully do and, to some extent, that seems to be part of the point. Your incisive review however, clarifies a lot of that ambiguity I walked away with particularly not knowing anything about the artist and his underlying themes. Reading it put me back in that space with a frame of reference in which I could begin to make some sense of it.
ReplyDeleteIn theory, I agree with Patrick in that I don't know that the references to his past work necessarily elucidate some of the subtler nuances of "March Forth", at least in your introduction. However, I think the connection becomes much clearer at the conclusion when you talk about how the show falls a bit short in relation to his previous ability to represent something profound without invoking the banal. Nice Job!!
Henry Taylor one of the most important Artists in the present, love him, hell I DO!
ReplyDelete