Print/Out at MOMA is a medium-specific
exhibition featuring twenty years of printmaking from the museum’s permanent collection. The show covers a wide range of print
technology, from Xerox to aquatint.
The entryway to the exhibit is coated in
half-tone dots from floor to ceiling, introducing the print as a series of dots,
which in combination as a grid or matrix allow us to reproduce and multiply an
image. Print/Out succeeds in
showing us why artists choose to work in print beyond just the creation of the
multiple. The use of the print can serve
as a way to charge the ideas explored by artists, as in the case of Rirkrit
Tiravanija whose portable Untitled
(rucksack installation) (1993) editions become tools that facilitate
interpersonal experiences.
Print/Out features the usual
cast of characters associated with print media, including Damien Hirst, Kara
Walker, and Robert Rauschenberg. The
inclusion of artists less commonly associated with print, such as Chris Burden and
Rirkrit Tiravanija, makes the show more compelling. The work chosen for the exhibition
illustrates that print is more than simply a process toward creating a
multiple, it can be used to create a unique art object as well.
The arrangement of Print/Out
is ambitious, beginning with a salon-style presentation of large prints,
displayed over the dot pattern found in the entryway to the gallery. Work by unrelated artists are arranged
together, similar only in the fact that they utilize print to expand the ideas
of each artist. With this understanding
it is easier to approach works without trying to tie them together
conceptually. Instead, the audience is
presented with the many ways in which print technology is used to expand the
ideas of artists.
In some cases the use of print
media becomes an unnecessary step in the artist’s process, as in Chris Burden’s,
Coyote Stories (2005). Coyote
Stories documents the artist’s interactions with coyotes on his Malibu
estate through a collection of journal entries on lined paper. These journal entries were photographed and
printed digitally, accompanied by drawings reproduced as etchings. It is difficult to understand the motivation
to use print in this case. Perhaps the reproduced images and their distance
from the artist’s hand are a metaphor for the relationship between artist and
Coyote. In any case, mechanical reproduction
does not enhance our experience with the work.
Robert Rauschenberg’s, Surface Series from Currents (1970), is
a series of screen-printed works created by collaging newspaper headlines. These prints map out time and capture a
moment on the flattened surface of the paper.
Rauschenberg’s sensitivity to the imagery collected and his ability to
embrace the half-tone pattern found in newspapers and advertisement allow the print
to become a unique object, not simply a copy or reproduction of the original
newspaper clippings.
Rirkrit Tiravanija stands out as
one of the few artists in the show whose prints are clearly a re-activation of
older works. The artist has recreated, Pad Thai (1990), where the audience was
served Thai curry in the gallery space, a gesture that encouraged interaction
between viewers. Untitled (rucksack
installation) (1993) facilitates
the interaction between viewers, but in a portable form. The edition includes a rice cooker,
ingredients for curry, instructions for building a tent and a backpack. This distribution of Pad Thai changes the potential for interpersonal experiences, moving
them outside of the gallery setting. Tiravanija’s
Untitled 2008-2011 (the map of the land
of feeling) traces time through appropriation and patterning, similar to
Rauschenberg’s Currents. This series of large scrolls stretch
horizontally across the wall and include maps, mazes, and pages from the artist’s
passport, capturing the experiences of the artist as he traverses the art world.
The works featured in Print/Out
are not in dialogue with one another thematically, as the audience might expect
with a curated show. Instead, we are
shown the many ways that artists utilize print technology, distribution, and
appropriation, to expand their ideas.
I like your take on Tiravanija's work. It makes me reconsider my previous dismissal of it. Definitely agree with your assessment of Burden's piece. It seemed like unnecessary efforts when a Xerox machine would have sufficed.
ReplyDeleteMy suggestions are few. Careful your spelling of Damien Hirst's name, even he deserves a modicum of respect. I would also consider talking a bit more in your conclusion about the impact or importance of the show, or lack there of. is one at all. Maybe some additional reason we should see it.
I found your critique of Bruden’s Coyote Stories insightful. Overall I enjoyed your review- especially now that I know this medium is one you work with. Just a few grammatical corrections: paragraph 5- “lined paper”; the paragraph on Rauchenberg- “works complied from” and “half-tone.” Lastly, and most significantly, I would like to hear more of your own voice in this review. You state in your first few and last paragraphs that this show is “overwhelming” but that it explains ways and reasons artists use print technology. You also mentioned that the pieces don’t relate to one another as one might expect. But you never tell us what you think about any of that- I think it would enhance your review if you took a stronger stance and opened up more about your perspective.
ReplyDelete