Print/Out: 20 Years in Print is the
Museum of Modern Art's highly anticipated survey of a medium that
is versatile, rooted in history, and appears to have no
limits. Chief Curator of Prints and Illustrated Books Christophe
Cherix displays works by more than forty artists in a salon style
show with prints literally installed from floor to ceiling. If stunning the viewer with hundreds of prints ranging in size,
content, and execution is what Cherix set out to do, then surely this
mission was accomplished.
A curator is faced with the
task of creating a common denominator amongst included works, a theme
or idea that the viewer must interpret. In Print/Out the differences, ambidexterity, and individualism of the numerous printmaking methods are what bind the show.
Many of the works are steeped in conceptual ideas such as Martin Kippenberger's Content on Tour which is an appropriation of an appropriation. He uses printmaking as a means to an end, sometimes cutting and slicing his own prints to make paintings. Others refer to and question the history of the medium, inventing new techniques for age-old processes such as
Jacob Samuels creation of the first portable aquatint box (1996).
Printmaking began as a mechanized way
to produce multiples, an idea that lends itself to portability and
affordability, but Cherix has made it clear that editions are no
longer a requirement for this medium. In fact only two editions, in
entirety, are included in this show, Kara Walker's Safety Curtain (1999) and Damien
Hirst's The Last Supper (1999). Walker's series highlights her preoccupation with paper
cut-out style grotesque yet humorous imagery focusing on slavery.
Hirst's is a pop-art series of large colored silkscreens of fake food labels. Both artists created a suite of images, editions comprised of many different prints. All of the intended images from the series are represented at MOMA, but are easy to miss for they are spread out amongst the
hundreds of works on the entire sixth floor.
With
such a mishmash of prints, and with the large amount of them on
display, smaller intimate works are easy to miss, but
are worth noting. For example Julie Mehretu's Untitled
(2004) from the Landscape
Allegories series.
This etching is an exploration of line and shape, referencing both nature and mathematics. It resembles a topographic map overlaid with imagery derived from nature. It is a traditional print, using multiple layers and transparent inks to achieve a broad range of color and tone, and is one of an edition
of seven. The print is technically stunning and
seems fragile and airy.
The more classic methods of
printmaking are juxtaposed with installations of groups such as
Superflex, who held a particpatory workshop where the viewer can
construct a hanging lamp with pre-printed photographs. General
Idea's group project, Magic Bullet (1992),
is also a memorable non-traditional take on
reproducibilty and distribution. Hundreds of silver pill-shaped
balloons imprinted with their logo fill the ceiling' skylight space,
but only as long as the helium's lifespan. Viewers are invited to
take home any of the piece's fallen soldiers, an interesting comment
on the intended portability of the print.
While many of the historically rooted prints included in the show seem to be
overpowered by bigger installations, and even the
gallery walls themselves which were covered in Benday dots, Cherix's decision to display
the many modes of printmaking in a salon style exhibit with prints
covering nearly every inch of the exhibition shows that there
is not one correct or preferred way to make a print these days. Equal opportunity is given to all of the modes of making. The show examines the
many possibilities of a medium that is often pigeonholed as outdated
and uninventive. By having a medium-specific themed show, the
viewer leaves not thinking of an inner dialogue about what
it all means but with a visual cornucopia of images and a greater
idea of the unlimited possibilities that can be found under the umbrella of printmaking.
I’m with you that the print show was an excellent mix of work, and I like that you honed in both on some of the big pieces and some of the small, easy-to-overlook ones. I’m not sure about introducing the show as “overwhelming,” because that sounds like a negative when applied to a curated show—or at least, doesn’t give a clear enough judgment on whether the curatorial style worked. There also seems to be a contradiction in the last paragraph where you start by saying that some pieces overpowered others, but that this was intentional, and then saying “Equal weight is given to all the modes of printmaking.” I’d think the curator would try NOT to let some works overpower others, instead giving the viewer equal chance to come across the quieter works in the show.
ReplyDeleteI like how much you push that printmaking can be experimental and that Print/Out was a true testament to the versatility of printmaking. I agree with Judith that using the term overwhelming to describe a show can be taken in a negative way. You do a great job of describing how many different visions of printmaking exist throughout the sixth floor. It could be nice if you explain more in depth about the processes involved in the experimental pieces like the glow in the dark prints. Overall the review makes me want to go back and investigate a few prints I may have passed by.
ReplyDeleteAs a whole, your piece is great, but I think the wording could be improved upon in the fourth paragraph. The first sentence is a bit awkward and the second is a fragment. But I do agree that some of the best pieces were the smaller ones and I'm glad you decided to focus on some of those. Also, be careful about referring to an edition. "Editions comprised of many different prints" is sort of oxymoronic- each print in an edition must be identical for it to be an edition.
ReplyDelete