I visit Chelsea galleries as a cynic, questioning the
machinations the art market and why the backdrop of the much too white pristine
space. I am overwhelmed by
the hustle in the art world. How the dealers, artists and collectors are all complicit. However this past month, at Arlene
Shechet’s show Slip at Sikkema and Jenkins
Gallery, I felt grateful to see this work and the beautiful space it was shown
in.
I
love ceramics but I have thought of it as a medium limited in craft and function.
Shechet’s pieces transcend my limited idea of the possibilities of clay and still
remain ceramic. They are simultaneously
vessels and sculptures, some are collapsing, while others sprawl. They rest on bases that Shechet builds
of metal, wood and bricks. The
bases are integral to the work, setting a specific stage for each individual
piece to perform a muted anthropomorphic monologue.
Although
the tradition of ceramics, like jazz, is global from the beginning of time,
there is an intrinsically American texture to ceramics and jazz. As the
tradition of Louis Armstrong progresses to Charlie Parker to Paul Moshen, Arlene
Shechet descends from Peter Volkos, and in turn, George Ohr. A tradition of American heroic ceramics
in continued through these artists. Shechet’s work is in dialogue with the
paintings of Elizabeth Murray.
Both Murray and Shechet use biomorphic shapes, bright colors, and reject
the traditional rectangle to frame the work. Shechet references Brancusi with her bases because there is
a direct dialogue with each base to its sculpture.
My
experience has been how challenging clay is to work with. A ceramics teacher once told me
that the mantra to throwing on the wheel that is “my ego is not my amigo.” Shechet has an equal partnership with
clay. Although it through her hand as the artist, the work is simultaneously
vessels, urns, and objects. The surfaces are mottled, and colorful, flat and
dimensional. I had a strange
sensation that it requires all five senses to see the work. One work stands unremarkable white base
with a dry, rough surface, yet the color is a lush orange. It looked as though it had been
inflated and was collapsing in on itself as it lost air. I wanted to eat it, mush it, and knock
it over at the same time. There
are several pieces with a lunar or coral like surface. Many are falling in on themselves, and
some are held up with seams. Some
are a series of modular cubes in layers.
Arlene Shechet transcends any preconceived notion I have of how clay can
behave. Each
example is a combination of tough and fragile. She uses easily identifiable materials and the combination is
indefinable. Each is an
investigation in balance. Each work is strikingly beautiful and ugly, formal,
and informal. Even the show’s
title, Slip, is multidimensional
whether it is technical use of slip as a bond, as a casting agent, slipping up,
or slip that you wear.
I
was grateful to experience these sculptures without cynicism. Each piece in the show seemed an
elegant balance. And the each
piece of the show: the artist, the gallery, the viewer worked in harmony.
This is a really nice review of the show, and I love your comparison to jazz music – you’re totally right about the sensation that these pieces are improvisational, yet respond to a historical precedence. I also enjoyed hearing your reaction to the work: it’s interesting that you felt all five senses should be involved, and that you had the urge to eat/mush/knock over the pieces. I wish you had explained more about the supports that the vessels were placed upon, because I felt that the pedestals beneath them were very important to the work as a whole. Also, more specific examples of particular pieces (with titles) would be great.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jessica that some examples of specific pieces would be very helpful, but I disagree regarding the jazz reference: it feels forced, doesn't add much, and the review is perfectly good without it. The comparison to Elizabeth Murray seems to work, though you could probably get some more mileage out of it. Same with the Brancusi reference: you seem to mention him in passing but I think there's a greater connection that could be explored there.
ReplyDelete